Press "Enter" to skip to content

South Carolina’s Whistleblower Protections – A Review for SC Attorneys, Lawyers and Law Firms

South Carolina informants who are utilized by a South Carolina state government organization are safeguarded from unfavorable business activities when they convenient report infringement of state or bureaucratic regulations or guidelines or other bad behavior. South Carolina lawyers, legal counselors and law offices who address SC state government informants ought to know about the securities stood to these representatives who are terminated, downgraded, suspended or generally exposed to an unfriendly activity in response to a report of extortion or other bad behavior by a public organization or one of its officials or workers. South Carolina informant lawyers, attorneys and law offices ought to likewise know about the authoritative necessities important to summon the insurances of the state’s enemy of counter rule, as well as the alleviation arrangements stood to such SC informants. There are additionally a few informant insurances for government and confidential representatives who report infringement of South Carolina’s word related wellbeing and wellbeing resolutions, rules or guidelines.

South Carolina’s Whistleblower Protection Act for State Government Employees

South Carolina’s General Whistleblower Attorney Assembly instituted regulation called the “Business Protection for Reports of Violations of State or Federal Law or Regulation” (the “Act”) to shield South Carolina state representatives from counter or disciplinary activities when they report infringement of state or government regulations or guidelines or other bad behavior including extortion and misuse. See South Carolina Code § 8-27-10, et seq. The Act forbids a South Carolina public body from diminishing the remuneration of, or excusing, suspending or downgrading, a state worker in light of the representative’s documenting of a safeguarded report of bad behavior with a fitting power. S.C. Code § 8-27-20(A). The safeguarded report should be made by the SC informant with honest intentions and not be a simple specialized infringement. Id. The Act doesn’t have any significant bearing to private, non-government businesses or workers. S.C. Code § 8-27-50.

A public body under the Act implies one of the accompanying South Carolina substances: (A) a branch of the State; (B) a state board, commission, panel, office, or authority; (C) a public or legislative body or political region of the State, including provinces, regions, school locale, or specific reason or public help locale; (D) an association, company, or office upheld in entire or to some extent by open assets or using public assets; or, (E) a semi administrative body of the State and its political regions. S.C. Code § 8-27-10(1).

A South Carolina representative under the Act is a worker of any South Carolina public body element, for the most part barring those state chiefs whose arrangement or business is dependent upon Senate affirmation. S.C. Code § 8-27-10(2).

A proper power under the Act implies either (A) the public body that utilizes the informant making the safeguarded report, or (B) an administrative, state, or neighborhood legislative body, office, or association having ward over criminal policing, infringement, proficient lead or morals, or bad behavior, including yet not restricted to, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (“SLED”), a County Solicitor’s Office, the State Ethics Commission, the State Auditor, the Legislative Audit Council (the “LAC”), and the Office of Attorney General (the “SCAG”). S.C. Code § 8-27-10(3). At the point when a safeguarded report is made to an element other than the public body utilizing the informant making the report, the Act expects that the utilizing public body be told when practicable by the substance that got the report. Id.